I appeared on the BTC Sessions podcast on June 11, 2026. In the episode, we discussed Bill C-22, why mandatory metadata retention is far more invasive than the government admits, and how the bill contradicts Canada’s own stated commitment to privacy rights. The link to the episode is here.
Articles by: Michael Geist
CTV News: Will Canada’s youth social media ban work?
I appeared on CTV News on June 11, 2026, where I discussed Canada’s proposed social media ban for children under 16, the privacy risks of age-verification requirements, and concerns about the effectiveness and implementation of the new online harms legislation. The link to the video can be found here.
Progress Canada Podcast: Michael Geist | Online Safety, Digital Surveillance, and Canada’s AI Future
I appeared on the Progress Canada Podcast on June 11, 2026. In the episode, I discussed online safety and the proposed social media ban for children under 16, privacy and surveillance concerns surrounding Bill C-22, and Canada’s approach to AI policy and digital sovereignty. The link to the episode is […]
BTC Sessions: What Bitcoiners MUST Know About New Surveillance Bill | Dr. Michael Geist
I appeared on BTC Sessions on June 11, 2026, where I discussed Bill C-22, including concerns about mandatory metadata retention, encryption and security risks, and the legislation’s broader implications for privacy and constitutional rights. The link to the video can be found here.
The Law to Be Named Later: Bill C-34 Punts 50 Key Decisions to Cabinet and a Digital Safety Commission That Does Not Yet Exist
The government’s plan to address online safety was introduced yesterday with Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, featuring an under-16 social media ban, pornography age verification, AI chatbot rules, and platform regulation that I argued amount to an everything-all-at-once approach built on a “trust us” bet. My initial guide to the bill highlighted many key issues, but this follow-up examines just how much has been left for later. In many respects, Bill C-34 is best understood as version 1.0 of the Safe Social Media Act with a framework that establishes institutions, sets penalty ceilings, and fixes the age of 16 in the statute. But the bill leaves nearly everything that will determine how the law actually works, including which services are covered, when the ban applies and to whom, what counts as adequate age verification, and what design features platforms must build, to what amounts to a version 2.0 that will be developed later through multiple regulatory processes.







