Fair Dealing by Giulia Forsythe (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/dRkXwP

Fair Dealing by Giulia Forsythe (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/dRkXwP

Copyright

The Bill C-32 Debate Begins: Locks, Levies & Misinformation on Fair Dealing

Second reading of Bill C-32 kicked off yesterday with hours of discussion from MPs from all political parties.  Six months after the bill was first introduced, the debate offered the first opportunity to get a sense of where the various parties stand and which issues will be most contentious when the committee tasked with review the bill begins hearings within the next couple of weeks (coverage from PostMedia).

The issue at the top of the Liberal and NDP agenda is digital locks.  Both parties (along with the Bloc) expressed concern with the digital lock approach in Bill C-32.  The Liberals repeatedly emphasized the need for consumers to have the right to circumvent for format shifting, backup copies, and other consumer activities.  This would require changes to both the consumer provisions and the general anti-circumvention provision, since both create barriers to these basic consumer activities.  Given that the U.S. now allows circumvention of DVDs for some non-commercial purposes, this seems like a reasonable compromise.  The NDP placed the spotlight on the impact of locks on education and teaching, describing the exceptions that require destruction of teaching materials 30 days after the end of the course as a digital book burning

Read more ›

November 3, 2010 18 comments News

Apple To Extend iTunes Music Previews to 90 Seconds

Apple is extending the length of iTunes music previews from 30 seconds to 90 seconds for songs longer than 2 minutes and 30 seconds.  It appears that the extension is a take it or leave proposition to music labels.

Read more ›

November 3, 2010 1 comment News

Access Copyright to the Supreme Court: No Need for Greater Fair Dealing Certainty

With Bill C-32 heading for second reading tomorrow, the inclusion of education as a fair dealing category looms as one of the big issues.  Groups such as Access Copyright oppose the reform and argue that legislative guidance on the scope of fair dealing is needed.  It turns out, however, that Access Copyright is prepared to argue precisely the opposite position when it suits.  This past summer, the copyright collective won a major fair dealing case at the Federal Court of Appeal, leading some education groups to seek leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.  Access Copyright is opposed to the leave application and its memorandum to the court says the current six part fair dealing test is good enough.  In particular, it argues:

Read more ›

November 1, 2010 18 comments News

No Creator Group Consensus on C-32

Last week I posted on an ACTRA document that identified consensus positions on C-32 among many creator groups.  I have received a request to remove the link to the ACTRA document on the grounds that it was posted prematurely as it turns out there is not yet consensus among all […]

Read more ›

November 1, 2010 3 comments News

The Latest on Access Copyright: Time to Decline the Coverage

Howard Knopf posts an exceptionally important update on the latest developments in the Access Copyright tariff proposal, including the attempt by the copyright collective to exclude 99 of the 101 objectors to its proposal and subsequent demand for an interim tariff to be set by the Copyright Board that would keep the cash flowing even without a formal agreement in place.  Knopf points to many legal shortcomings in the Access Copyright position, most notably the serious questions about its repertoire and its ability to actually sue successfully for copyright infringement.

The latest developments further point to growing sentiment on Canadian campuses that it is time for post-secondary education to decline the coverage by walking away from Access Copyright.  Since this statement is bound to be mischaracterized as advocating not paying for the rights to use works, let me repeat what I consistently stated this summer.  The decision to walk away is not an effort to avoid paying appropriate rights fees.  Rather, it is based on the recognition that a collective licence is not the only way for a university to appropriately compensate for use. 

Read more ›

November 1, 2010 24 comments News