My series on why the Industry committee was right to ignore the Canadian Heritage committee study as part of the national copyright review has focused on process (the government vested sole responsibility with the Industry committee, its clear assertion as the authoritative copyright review, and an examination of the witness and brief list that confirms that Industry conducted a much more comprehensive consultation that overlapped with much of Heritage but also included hundreds of additional witnesses and briefs.
Recent Posts
The Canadian Digital Law Decade: The Ten Most Notable Cases, Laws, and Policy Developments 
Netflix Data Suggests Streaming Giant Spending One-Third of Canadian Revenues on Film and TV Production in Canada 
Tax Policy Confusion: What Digital Taxes are on the Canadian Government’s Agenda? 
The LawBytes Podcast, Episode 36: The Year in Canadian Digital Law and Policy 
Making the Best of a Bad Provision: Why Canada Should Work Toward a Copyright Term Extension Registration Requirement
