My recent series reviewing the Industry Committee’s copyright review (process, evidence, witness balance, citation) was about more that just why the decision to ignore the Canadian Heritage committee study on artist remuneration was justified. The series provides a data-backed assessment of the quality of the consultation of the respective committees, which is inextricably linked to their final recommendations. The better process is important because when comparing the recommendations from the two committees, the Industry committee consistently provided deeper analysis even in areas where there was agreement. The better analysis is not a coincidence: better process generates better policy and the Industry committee engaged in broader consultations in which it heard both from more creators and more users than Heritage.
Archive for June 26th, 2019
Law Bytes
Episode 217: David Fraser on the Privacy Implications of the Federal Court of Appeal’s Facebook Ruling
byMichael Geist
October 28, 2024
Michael Geist
October 21, 2024
Michael Geist
September 30, 2024
Michael Geist
September 23, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- CRTC Approves Google’s $100 Million Online News Act Exemption Deal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 217: David Fraser on the Privacy Implications of the Federal Court of Appeal’s Facebook Ruling
- When Antisemitism No Longer Shocks
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 216: Game Changer or More of the Same? Patrick Leblond on the New Global E-Commerce Agreement
- Is Meta Offside the Online News Act? The CRTC Wants to Know.