The site has added 15 new PIPEDA decisions recently posted by the Federal Privacy Commissioner’s office. The new decisions include: DECISION #207 – Cellphone Company Meets Conditions for Opt-out Consent (August 6, 2003) www.privacyinfo.ca/dcsn.php? DECISION #205 – First Name Disclosed Without Knowledge and Consent (August 5, 2003) DECISION #204 – Telecommunications Company Allegedly Refuses Service Because Individual Fails to Provide SIN (August 5, 2003) DECISION #203 – Individual Raises Concerns About Consent Clauses (August 5, 2003) DECISION #202 – Telecommunications Company Requests Two Pieces of Identification From a New Subscriber (August 5, 2003) DECISION #201 – Former Employer Delays Access to Personal Information (August 1, 2003) DECISION #200 – Bank Disclosure Causes Wedding To Be Cancelled (August 6, 2003) DECISION #199 – Bank Improperly Invokes Time Extension Provision (August 1, 2003) DECISION #198 – Employer Accused of Wrongful Disclosure (August 1, 2003) DECISION #197 – Bank Allegedly Sent Personal Information in Unsealed Envelopes (August 1, 2003) DECISION #196 – Customer Denied Access to his Personal Information (August 1, 2003) DECISION #195 – Company Exceeds Time Limits in Responding to Request for Access to Personal Information (July 23, 2003) DECISION #194 – Credit Reporting Agencies Allegedly Misused Consumers Social Insurance Numbers (July 16, 2003) DECISION #193 – Telecommunications Company Does Credit Check Without Consent (July 10, 2003) see: Globe and Mail coverage also see: Canadian Privacy Law Review Information
Privacyinfo.ca Update #14
October 31, 2003
Share this post
One Comment

Law Bytes
Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection
byMichael Geist

October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection

Chief
Need a bit of white space here. As it is, the text is too dense. This is how we hide stuff we don’t want the public to read.