My regular Toronto Star Law Bytes column (Toronto Star version, HTML backup article, homepage version) highlights my new study on the state of anti-spam legislative measures in Canada. Despite absence of specific anti-spam legislation, the paper argues that when viewed in combination, the current Canadian legal options allow for enforcement actions against virtually all of the conduct identified by most global anti-spam legislation including the use of deceptive headers, failure to honor opt-out requests, limitations on email address harvesting and sales, and the unauthorized use of computing equipment to send spam. The problem, the paper argues, rests primarily with the lack of aggressive enforcement initiatives. also see: Untouchable? A Canadian Perspective on the Anti-Spam Battle
Untouchable? A Plan for Battling Spam in Canada
May 3, 2004
Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 153: Jennifer Quaid on the Competition Bureau’s Appeal of the Rogers-Shaw Merger Decision
byMichael Geist

January 23, 2023
Michael Geist
January 16, 2023
Michael Geist
December 19, 2022
Michael Geist
December 12, 2022
Michael Geist
December 5, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
Champagne’s Choice
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 153: Jennifer Quaid on the Competition Bureau’s Appeal of the Rogers-Shaw Merger Decision
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 152: Konrad von Finckenstein on the Challenges That Lie Ahead for the CRTC
Listen Up: My Recent Podcast Appearances on Bills C-11, C-18 and Canadian Copyright Law
The Year in Review: Top Ten Law Bytes Podcast Episodes