David Collier-Brown, a published author with O'Reilly, posts his copyright consultation submission. Collier-Brown notes that the electronic availability of his book helped make it the outstanding seller in his class and warns that anti-circumvention legislation would harm him as an author.
Collier-Brown on Copyright Reform
4 Comments
Recent Posts
What Is With This Government and Privacy?: Political Party Privacy Safeguards Removed in “Affordability Measures” Bill 
More Than Just Phone Book Data: Why the Government is Dangerously Misleading on its Warrantless Demands for Internet Subscriber Information 
Privacy At Risk: Government Buries Lawful Access Provisions in New Border Bill 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 234: “Solutions Aren’t Going to be Found Through Nostalgia”: Mark Musselman on the CRTC Hearings on Canadian Content Rules 
Here We Go Again: Internet Age Verification and Website Blocking Bill Reintroduced in the Senate (With Some Changes)
Finally…
A comment from a content producer. Most of the stuff that I’ve seen to date on this is from publishers and lobbyists for special interest groups. While not his specific book, I’ve used O’Reilly reference books in the past; they tend to be invaluable works. Having been able to find one of them on the Internet, at the O’Reilly site, led me to purchase the book as I find that paper copies are more useful while working.
One thing that I like about his the submission is the experience with the DMCA and fraudulent claims of copyright infringement by a publisher against the actual copyright holder, in an effort to force customers to access the work through the publisher. Should a notice-and-takedown, or a “three strikes” type clause be introduced into the Canadian law, it needs to be balanced by severe penalties for abuse of those clauses (for instance, graduated fines, starting at $500K for the first infraction and doubling with each infraction, no upper limit… an infraction being a claim against an individual on a single work… so a fraudulent claim on 3 works would be levied a fine of $3.5 million, on 4 $7.5 million, etc).
Very interesting recommendations
His thoughts on orphan works deserve serious consideration. Something is broken when you cannot get an out-of-print book for hide nor hair.
Of course, in the brave new world of Google Books, what it means to be published might need revisiting.
I should have mentioned Google …
.. .but I was afraid I was going to get too far
off-topic.
–dave
I should have mentioned Google …
.. .but I was afraid I was going to get too far
off-topic.
–dave