KEI's Jamie Love recently had the opportunity to ask USTR Ambassador Ron Kirk about the lack of transparency associated with ACTA. Kirk responded implausibly that people might walk away from the negotiations if the text was made public.
USTR Ambassador Kirk On ACTA: People Would Walk if ACTA Public
Tags: acta / anti-counterfeiting trade agreement / copyright / Counterfeit / counterfeiting / kirk / USTR
3 Comments
Recent Posts
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots 
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests 
Make It Make Sense: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Plan 
Why Social Media and AI Chatbot Bans for Kids Are Bad Policy: Making the Case at the Senate Social Affairs, Science and Tech Committee
That is hilarious, but not so implausible. If their part in the illicit dealings became public, they would be forced to walk away. Makes perfect sense to me.
Perfectly Plausible
Makes perfect sense to me. A number of groups have had great success in embarrassing industry participants in copyright negotiations in other forums, by way of exposing the absurdity of their “evidence”, the consequences of their demanded policies, etc. Were the ACTA text and negotiation process to become public before it became law, they’d face the same embarrassment there and would, no doubt, walk away.
The problem they face is that the policies these industry bodies desire are so fundamentally hostile to the public interest that any attempt to justify or promote them in public will wind up being “embarrassing”.
If you were planning a scheme that you knew would screw hundred of thousands of others, and your partner went and announced it on the news, wouldn’t you walk away?