CRTC Issues Warning to Rogers: Address Throttling Concern or Face Public Hearing
2 Comments
Recent Posts
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse 
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do 
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban 
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection
Nice to see the CRTC is actually doing something to help the people. Seems they can do it… from time to time.
Subtlety
Did anyone else catch the subtlety of wording here?
“If the company fails to provide the above-noted information by that date, the Commission may initiate a public process to examine the matter in more detail.”
“MAY”…they may initiate a public process. There is no commitment to anything here.