The Issues Surrounding Subscriber Information in Bill C-30
February 29, 2012
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 260: What the Government Didn’t Want You To Hear About Bill C-4 And Its Weak Political Party Privacy Rules
byMichael Geist

March 2, 2026
Michael Geist
February 23, 2026
Michael Geist
February 9, 2026
Michael Geist
Episode 256: Jennifer Quaid on Taking On Big Tech With the Competition Act's Private Right of Access
February 2, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 260: What the Government Didn’t Want You To Hear About Bill C-4 And Its Weak Political Party Privacy Rules
Why the Online Harms Act is the Wrong Way to Regulate AI Chatbots
More Transparency Not Police Reporting: Navigating the Safety-Privacy Balance for AI ChatBots
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 259: The Privacy and Surveillance Risks of AI Chatbot Reporting to Police
Nobody Wants This: Senate Rejects Government’s Anti-Privacy Plan for Political Parties By Sending Bill Back to the House With a Sunset Clause

It’s good to see some mention of the fact multiple people/machines share an IP address. In fact I’d imagine the majority of connections in Canada do. It’s something this bill seems to entirely overlook and makes no mention of.
Considering the large number of unsecured routers that are merely purchased and plugged in I think this bill requires some sort of protection. We’ve all seen what allegations of anything related to child porngraphy can do to a person and their reputation.
http://www.buylebronjames9shoes.com/
555linli8
The tyrant dies and his rule ends, the martyr dies and his rule begins.