The Issues Surrounding Subscriber Information in Bill C-30
February 29, 2012
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
byMichael Geist

October 26, 2026
Michael Geist
October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism

It’s good to see some mention of the fact multiple people/machines share an IP address. In fact I’d imagine the majority of connections in Canada do. It’s something this bill seems to entirely overlook and makes no mention of.
Considering the large number of unsecured routers that are merely purchased and plugged in I think this bill requires some sort of protection. We’ve all seen what allegations of anything related to child porngraphy can do to a person and their reputation.
http://www.buylebronjames9shoes.com/
555linli8
The tyrant dies and his rule ends, the martyr dies and his rule begins.