The Issues Surrounding Subscriber Information in Bill C-30
February 29, 2012
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age
byMichael Geist

March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
March 16, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
A Standard That Doesn’t Exist: Parliamentary Secretary for Justice Offers Misleading Defence of Bill C-22’s Lower Threshold for Subscriber Information
More Surveillance Demands to Come?: Government Admits Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Provisions Could Be Expanded
Win, Lose or Draw?: The Federal Court of Appeal Overrules a Key Copyright Case on Procedural Grounds
The Lawful Access Debate Begins: Canadians Should Pay Attention to What the Government Isn’t Saying
The Global Battle for Data Control: How the 2026 U.S. Report on Trade Barriers Targets Data Sovereignty Worldwide

It’s good to see some mention of the fact multiple people/machines share an IP address. In fact I’d imagine the majority of connections in Canada do. It’s something this bill seems to entirely overlook and makes no mention of.
Considering the large number of unsecured routers that are merely purchased and plugged in I think this bill requires some sort of protection. We’ve all seen what allegations of anything related to child porngraphy can do to a person and their reputation.
http://www.buylebronjames9shoes.com/
555linli8
The tyrant dies and his rule ends, the martyr dies and his rule begins.