No related posts.


Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection
The What, Me Worry? Consultation: Media Quietly Tells Government It Wants Even More Funding With Little Concern for Independence Risks
Michael Geist
mgeist@uottawa.ca
This web site is licensed under a Creative Commons License, although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed.
TPP—undermining
How much power can Canadians expect from the constitution and legal policies to be useful in countering the negative effects of the bilateral trade agreements CETA and TPP? Can boycotting or selective tax protesting be an offsetting factor to these sovereignty busting agreements?
Not sure that those routes are the best paths to achieving those goals…?
With the author said, this is a good article I see this article, it is feeling, so I wrote this comment
———————————————
beats by dre