Post Tagged with: "c-32"

Access Copyright to the Supreme Court: No Need for Greater Fair Dealing Certainty

With Bill C-32 heading for second reading tomorrow, the inclusion of education as a fair dealing category looms as one of the big issues.  Groups such as Access Copyright oppose the reform and argue that legislative guidance on the scope of fair dealing is needed.  It turns out, however, that Access Copyright is prepared to argue precisely the opposite position when it suits.  This past summer, the copyright collective won a major fair dealing case at the Federal Court of Appeal, leading some education groups to seek leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.  Access Copyright is opposed to the leave application and its memorandum to the court says the current six part fair dealing test is good enough.  In particular, it argues:

Read more ›

November 1, 2010 18 comments News

No Creator Group Consensus on C-32

Last week I posted on an ACTRA document that identified consensus positions on C-32 among many creator groups.  I have received a request to remove the link to the ACTRA document on the grounds that it was posted prematurely as it turns out there is not yet consensus among all […]

Read more ›

November 1, 2010 3 comments News

Against Bill C-32: Creator Groups Stake Out Strong Anti-Copyright Bill Position

Update 11/1: I have received a request to remove the link to the ACTRA document on the grounds that it was posted prematurely.  I have been advised that there is not yet consensus among all groups listed in the document on the various C-32 issues.

When Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore told an IP conference last June that only two groups of radical extremists were opposed to Bill C-32, most assumed that he had user groups in mind.  Yet as various groups begin to publicly make their positions known, few have been as critical as a creator coalition that includes ACTRA, a writers’ coalition, visual arts coalition, and Quebec artists groups.  In a backgrounder on the bill, those groups oppose nearly all the major reform elements of Bill C-32, with the notable exception of digital locks (on which they remain silent).

Just how broad is the opposition?  The position paper stakes out the following positions:

Read more ›

October 28, 2010 78 comments News

The Art of Selling Chocolate: Remarks on Copyright’s Domain

IP Osgoode posts on University of Toronto law professor Abraham Drassinower’s contribution to From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda his article The Art of Selling Chocolate: Remarks on Copyright’s Domain. The article features an exhaustive analysis of Justice Michel Bastrache’s opinion in the Euro-Excellence […]

Read more ›

October 27, 2010 Comments are Disabled News

Wire Report on Radical Extremism to Balanced Copyright Book

The Wire Report features a story, including a question and answer transcript of an interview with me, on From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda.

Read more ›

October 27, 2010 Comments are Disabled News