Post Tagged with: "c-61"

CP on C-61

The Canadian Press covers the controversy over Bill C-61, with particular emphasis on its impact on privacy and consumer rights.

Read more ›

July 10, 2008 Comments are Disabled News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 13: Music Shifting Provision and One Copy Per Device

Today's proposed reform comes directly from a reader of the blog who writes: While I was reading your latest entry in "61 Reforms to C-61," I realized that the "one copy per device" limitation on "format shifting" as described in Section 29.22(1)(d)(i) makes a common practice of mine illegal – […]

Read more ›

July 9, 2008 21 comments News

Copyright Watch on Prentice’s Parrots

Copyright Watch notes the striking similarity between Industry Minister Jim Prentice's talking points and some letters to the editor from local chambers of commerce."

Read more ›

July 9, 2008 3 comments News

Kitimat Sentinal on C-61

"It's going to be a long, hot summer."

Read more ›

July 9, 2008 Comments are Disabled News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 12: Music Shifting Provision and Private Copying

I noted last week that Bill C-61 creates a legal framework that means that consumers may buy a CD and pay the levy on a blank CD, yet still violate the law if they circumvent copy-controls in order to make a private copy of their purchased CD.  There is a second private copying angle that merits analysis.  The music shifting provision blocks users from shifting music to their iPod if they borrowed or rented the sound recording to be shifted.  However, in what may be a case of bad drafting, the same provision appears to allow users to transfer borrowed or rented CDs to their iPod with one additional step that bring private copying into the picture.  The process requires the user to make a private copy of a sound recording onto a blank CD.  The private copying system allows for such copies from borrowed or rented CDs.  The user then shifts the sound recordings from the private copied CD to their iPod. 

This additional step would appear to meet the requirements of the law (Section 29.22(1)), namely:

Read more ›

July 8, 2008 10 comments News