While the government has yet to post submissions to the copyright consultation, the online discussion forum has been active. University of Ottawa law student Frances Munn will be tracking the discussion and providing regular updates. Her first report, current to the morning of July 22nd and grouped into the five questions, is posted below (note that the number of responses is cumulative).
Post Tagged with: "copycon"
Tracking the Copyright Consultation Online Discussion Forum
Tracking the Copyright Consultation Online Discussion Forum
While the government has yet to post submissions to the copyright consultation, the online discussion forum has been active. University of Ottawa law student Frances Munn will be tracking the discussion and providing regular updates. Her first report, current to the morning of July 22nd and grouped into the five questions, is posted below (note that the number of responses is cumulative).
Copyright Consultation Coverage: Submissions, Media, Letters
Submissions to the copyright consultation are beginning to pop-up. I posted my short answer earlier today and there are additional online postings here, here, and here as well as a sample letter from the Canadian Coalition for Electronic Rights. Meanwhile, there is media coverage from Torontoist, Sun Media, and the […]
Yet Another Call for An ISP Levy
Marian Hebb writes an op-ed in the Georgia Straight calling for a collective rights model for written materials found online, arguing that it "would likely mean a small subscription increase, payable by users to their Internet service provider, to cover most copyright material they can download freely from the Internet."
Responding to the Copyright Consultation: My Short Answer
I will have news on a new copyright consultation website that I'm launching shortly, but I wanted to post my short response to the just-launched copyright consultation. The consultation asks five broad questions, each of which could lead to lengthy answers that mine the depths of Canadian copyright law. I plan to post longer responses to the consultation that expands on the issues raised by the government over the course of the next eight weeks, but as Canadians think about their response (and submission takes nothing more than email) I think a short answer that is accessible now is crucial.
My short answer would begin by noting that the five questions can really be grouped into three key issues:
- Why does copyright matter to you?
- How can the government ensure that copyright reforms remain relevant in the long term?
- What specific reforms should the government prioritize (having regard for creativity, innovation, competition, and the digital economy)?
Why does copyright matter?
The consultation’s first question is also the most personal since the answer will be different for almost everyone.
For me, copyright matters because I am a professor and my students need access to copyrighted materials and the freedom to use those materials. It matters because I am a researcher who needs assurance that as materials are archived they will not be locked down under digital rights management. It matters because I am deeply concerned about privacy and fear that DRM could be harmful to my personal privacy. It matters because I have created videos and need flexibility in the law to allow for remix and transformed works and do not want my content taken down from the Internet based on unproven claims. It matters because I am a writer and I need certainty of access to speak freely. It matters because I am a consumer of digital entertainment and I want the law to reasonably reflect the right to view the content on the device of my choice. It matters because I am a parent whose children have only known life with the Internet and I want to ensure that they experience all the digital world has to offer. It matters because I live in a city with a strong connection to the digital economy and we need forward-looking laws to allow the next generation of companies to thrive. It matters because I am a proud Canadian who wants laws based not on external political pressure, but rather on the best interest of millions of Canadians.