In response to my recent Toronto Star column defending PIPEDA, Canada’s privacy law, the paper today features a debate over the arguments presented in that column. Professor Richard Owens argues that PIPEDA "tarnishes lawmaking, impedes business unnecessarily and threatens constitutional disorder", while I continue to defend the privacy statute, maintaining that the historical record suggests that business actively upported the law and the establishment of a national standard in its current form. see: Canada Badly Needs National Standard also see: Owens Rebuttal
The Debate Over Privacy Law Continues
February 6, 2004
Share this post
Episode 74: Heidi Tworek on the Challenges of Internet Platform Regulation
by
Michael Geist

January 25, 2021
Michael Geist
December 14, 2020
Michael Geist
December 7, 2020
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 74: Heidi Tworek on the Challenges of Internet Platform Regulation
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 20: The Case Against Bill C-10
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 19: The Misleading Comparison to the European Union
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 18: The USMCA Trade Threat That Could Lead to Billions in Retaliatory Tariffs
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 17: The Uncertain Policy Directive