In response to my recent Toronto Star column defending PIPEDA, Canada’s privacy law, the paper today features a debate over the arguments presented in that column. Professor Richard Owens argues that PIPEDA "tarnishes lawmaking, impedes business unnecessarily and threatens constitutional disorder", while I continue to defend the privacy statute, maintaining that the historical record suggests that business actively upported the law and the establishment of a national standard in its current form. see: Canada Badly Needs National Standard also see: Owens Rebuttal
The Debate Over Privacy Law Continues
February 6, 2004
Share this post

Law Bytes
Episode 266: Justin Safayeni on the Ontario Government's Overnight Evisceration of Access to Information
byMichael Geist

April 27, 2026
Michael Geist
Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
April 20, 2026
Michael Geist
March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Going Through the Motions: How Parliament Is Shutting Down Study and Debate on Political Party Privacy
Why The Senate Got Antisemitism Only Half-Right
The Government Doubles Down on News Sector Support: Fiscal Update Opens the Door to Tens of Millions in Tax Credits for Bell, Rogers and Corus
The Illusion of Protection: Why Canada’s Growing Push to Ban Social Media for Kids Won’t Work
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 266: Justin Safayeni on the Ontario Government’s Overnight Evisceration of Access to Information
