Wesley Wark on the "badly broken" state of access to information in Canada.
Waiting for Access
June 26, 2008
Share this post
2 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
byMichael Geist
April 22, 2024
Michael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
On the subject of “Access To Information”, one needs to ensure that a balanced discussion takes place. Complaints seem to come primarily from two sources: the first is the people who submit the requests and complain about how long it takes to get a response. The second group is the folks complaining about the cost of government, and the size of the budgets and the number of people employed.
I’ll address the latter first. These people are generally not complaining about the ATI specifically, but rather are comparing the costs of government to a private business. What they fail to realize is that a private business has no need for an ATI-like organization. The cost in person hours is quite large, and the overhead of this doesn’t seem to be normally taken into consideration when people examine the budgets of government departments… they see the wages, but not what it goes to. Given that the size of the public service has been a political hot potato for a number of years, the number of people employed was reduced, but none of the workload reduced. This gives rise to the second group.
The second group, from what I can see, seems to be composed primarily of politicians, press and academics. They use the information for a number of purposes, and access would be a good thing, but one needs to remember the cost of the program (see previous paragraph). The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms contains no “right to know” clause… so one needs to remember that ATI is a privilege, and as with all privileges, should not be abused.
I have no problem with an ATI program, except that it should be full cost recovery.
I completely agree Kevin.