Amazon has caved to pressure from the Authors Guild, who indicated that it might sue over the text-to-speech technology in the Kindle. Amazon maintained that the feature was legal, but presumably dropped the feature for business reasons.
Amazon Caves on Kindle
March 1, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments
Episode 127: Lucie Guibault on Canada's Approach to Copyright Term Extension
byMichael Geist

May 2, 2022
Michael Geist
April 25, 2022
Michael Geist
April 11, 2022
Michael Geist
April 4, 2022
Michael Geist
March 28, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Unrecognizable Bill C-11: The Online Streaming Act Comes to the Heritage Committee
No Comment: Government Moves to End Debate on Online News Bill Despite a No-Show from Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez
Is the Government Seeking to Short Circuit the Senate Review of Bill C-11?
CRTC Chair Confirms Bill C-11 Captures User Content, Will Take Years to Implement
Is There Anything Less Convincing than CRTC Chair Ian Scott’s Empty Assurances on Bill C-11 User Content Regulation?
Ficticious copyright violation?
The BOOK is the “product” that is copyrighted.
Any audio package for such a book would be directly DERIVED FROM that book, and should only be considered “reading” the work. It’s not a “sound track”, in the “movie” or “music” sense, and the book is complete without it.
It’s utter nonsense that someone can/would claim “copyright” over the very ACT of reading anything, as such a copyright could make ANY reading of a book “illegal”.
What would that mean for schools??
Reading a book, and even recording that reading can’t possibly constitute “copying” the product itself.
This is madness.
The practice of copyright itself needs to die.
>sigh
I realize one shouldn’t “feel sorry” for people with vision impairments, but it seems the blind are the collateral damage here. Exemptions don’t mean **** if the feature gets pulled before market.
Not like that impacts Canadians anyway.
CNIB should sue…
For discrimination.