The NY Times reports that a federal judge on Monday struck down patents on two genes linked to breast and ovarian cancer. The decision, if upheld, could throw into doubt the patents covering thousands of human genes and reshape the law of intellectual property.
U.S. Judge Invalidates Human Gene Patent
2 Comments
Recent Posts
The Year in Review: Top Ten Michael Geist Substacks 
The Year in Review: Top Ten Law Bytes Podcast Episodes 
The Year in Review: Top Ten Posts 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 254: Looking Back at the Year in Canadian Digital Law and Policy 
Confronting Antisemitism in Canada: If Leaders Won’t Call It Out Without Qualifiers, They Can’t Address It
“Myriad Genetics, the company that holds the patents with the University of Utah Research Foundation, asked the court to dismiss the case, claiming that the work of isolating the DNA from the body transforms it and makes it patentable. ”
So, they claim they aren’t actually patenting the two genes, they are patenting transformed version of the genes? To me this would invalidate the work of the human genome project, as they cataloged not the human genome but some variation thereof… Or am I understanding the claim incorrectly?
They’re claiming that isolated DNA is “transformed”, so the not-found-in-nature requirement of a patent doesn’t apply to the genes.