The Economist has a must-read editorial on copyright, arguing that the law has swung too far toward being restrictive. It argues for shortened copyright terms, renewal requirements, and expanded fair use.
The Economist on Copyright: Shorter Terms, Expanded Fair Use
April 9, 2010
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots
byMichael Geist

May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
April 27, 2026
Michael Geist
Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
April 20, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
How Much Further Will Lawful Access Go?: Police Chief Tells Bill C-22 Hearing That Three Years of Metadata Retention Would Be “Ideal”
Bill C-22’s Groundhog Day: Why the Government’s Dismissal of Signal, Apple and the U.S. Congress Concerns Runs Back the Disastrous Online News Act Playbook
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests

Hallelujah baby!
Copyright terms and their total lack of requirement to renew, are the single biggest beef I have with current copyright law.
Reduce those terms significantly, and I might be inclined to hang up my cutlass. Then we could have a serious talk about fair use and a host of other irritants.
While I am aware that the powers that be wont take much advice from a one armed seafaring mariner with gold teeth, there is a good chance that they would give due consideration when the same words come from a publication such as The Economist. With the EU currently trying to press Canada into extending copyright terms without any consideration given to society, this is a most timely piece.
At the risk of sounding like a liberal wacko, freeing ideas sooner and reducing iteration time on products/ideas/etc would be phenomenally beneficial to all.
Look at the impact the internet has had on society. And it’s like 15 years old.
Rupert, that’s how the open source process works: release early, release often. (You sound like someone who knows open source, but if you don’t, Firefox, Linux, the immensely popular Apache web server, Ubuntu, GNU, etc. are open source).
This fellow has a pretty influential paper on the topic:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/
And yes, if I haven’t made it obvious, I totally agree with you 🙂