The Government of India has just introduced a major new copyright reform package. Of particular note from a Canadian perspective are the approaches to fair dealing and anti-circumvention. On fair dealing, the provision is expanded to cover "private and personal use." On anti-circumvention, the bill is consistent with implementing the WIPO Internet treaties in a manner that retains equal rights both online and offline. The provision specifically targets circumvention for the purposes of copyright infringement and does not target the distribution or marketing of devices that can be used to circumvent.
India Introduces Major Copyright Reform Bill
April 22, 2010
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
byMichael Geist

Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
April 20, 2026
Michael Geist
March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
March 16, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
AI Without Canada: Why the Heritage Committee’s AI Report Could Lead to Less Canadian Content in the Training Data
Addressing the AI Policy Challenge: My Appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications
Lawful Access Heads to Committee: The Opposition Found Its Voice, the Government Never Found Its Defence
Is Data De-Identification Dead?: Why the AI Privacy Risk Isn’t What It Learns, But What It Figures Out
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 265: Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI

Explicit fair dealing provisions that exempt a person from liability for circumventing DRM are, to the best of my knowledge, quite possibly the only sane way to satisfy the pressures for countries to have anti-circumvention provisions in their copyright laws at all, while still remaining a free nation that embraces healthy competition. I strongly hope Canada does likewise. To not do so while adopting any anticircumvention provisions is to basically render null and void any fair dealing provisions that country may have formerly had, as an increasing quantity of material gets stored digitally, making any laws that do not apply to digital goods less and less relevant.
Draft Bill Propostion on Civil Rights Framework for Internet in Brazil
Hi, Michael.
This is a great piece of news not only for India, but for the world. And in a parallel, we in Brazilian government are trying to do something about the Internet, in order to grant freemdons and liberties.
Please, would you be so nice to take a look at it?
Thanks already.
Draft Bill Propostion on Civil Rights Framework for Internet in Brazil
The link (the html code was not accepted):
http://culturadigital.br/marcocivil/2010/04/20/draft-bill-propostion-on-civil-rights-framework-for-internet-in-brazil/
It may be that some of the changes in India’s copyright bill are good,
but it does not deserve unreserved praise. Any new prohibition
against breaking digital handcuffs is a change for the worse, and
cannot be justified. If a WIPO treaty “requires” this, that’s merely
a reason to reject the treaty.