Bell Pays $10 Million To Settle Misleading Advertising Claim
3 Comments
Recent Posts
Everything You Wanted to Know About a Kids’ Social Media Ban (But Were Rightly Afraid to Ask): A FAQ on Age Verification and Mandated ID for Everyone 
Bill C-22’s Clause-by-Clause Problem: The Government Includes Agencies Seeking Lawful Access Powers But Blocks the Privacy Commissioner’s Return 
You Can’t Put the Toothpaste Back in the Tube: Why the Government’s Reported “Temporary” Plan for a Kids’ Social Media Ban Would Mean Mandated ID for Everyone 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 271: Taking Stock of a Wild Week in Canadian Digital Policy With the Online Streaming Reversal, AI Strategy Release, and Lawful Access Review 
Canadian American Business Council on Bill C-22: It “Threatens Our Bilateral Partnership on Data Security”
It seems to me that whether or not the “maximum fine” is an impressive figure or not depends very much on the sum difference between advertised and actual rates since 2007.
It could just be a cost of doing business.
Complainant
Do we know who actually complained to the Competition Bureau?
I like how Bell’s denial of wrong-doing that you linked to says nothing to explain the difference in interpretation.