Bell Pays $10 Million To Settle Misleading Advertising Claim
3 Comments
Recent Posts
How Much Further Will Lawful Access Go?: Police Chief Tells Bill C-22 Hearing That Three Years of Metadata Retention Would Be “Ideal” 
Bill C-22’s Groundhog Day: Why the Government’s Dismissal of Signal, Apple and the U.S. Congress Concerns Runs Back the Disastrous Online News Act Playbook 
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots 
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests
It seems to me that whether or not the “maximum fine” is an impressive figure or not depends very much on the sum difference between advertised and actual rates since 2007.
It could just be a cost of doing business.
Complainant
Do we know who actually complained to the Competition Bureau?
I like how Bell’s denial of wrong-doing that you linked to says nothing to explain the difference in interpretation.