Bell Pays $10 Million To Settle Misleading Advertising Claim
3 Comments
Recent Posts
Ofcom Did the Work Canada Plans to Skip: What the UK’s Age Verification Report Reveals About the Bill C-34 Social Media Ban 
The Age Verification Bill That Won’t Die: How Bill S-209 Complicates the Government’s Bill C-34 Online Safety Plan 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms 
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse 
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
It seems to me that whether or not the “maximum fine” is an impressive figure or not depends very much on the sum difference between advertised and actual rates since 2007.
It could just be a cost of doing business.
Complainant
Do we know who actually complained to the Competition Bureau?
I like how Bell’s denial of wrong-doing that you linked to says nothing to explain the difference in interpretation.