I have posted several pieces on the recent Supreme Court of Canada copyright decisions (an
immediate overview, a
piece on why Canada has shifted to fair use, an
analysis of the inclusion of a technological neutrality principle, and a
discussion on the implication for Access Copyright). My weekly technology law column (
Toronto Star version,
homepage version) also focused on the decision. It noted that copyright cases only reach the Supreme Court of Canada once every few years, ensuring that each case is carefully parsed and analyzed. Last week, the court issued rulings on five copyright cases in a single day, an unprecedented tally that will keep copyright experts busy for many months to come.
While the initial coverage unsurprisingly focused on the specific outcomes for the litigants, including wins for Apple (no fees for song previews on services such as iTunes), the entertainment software industry (no additional payment for music included in downloaded video games), and the education community (copying materials for instructional purposes may qualify as fair dealing), the bigger story are three broad principles that lie at the heart of the court’s decisions.
Read more ›