The Broadcasting Act blunder series has identified many of the negative consequences stemming from Bill C-10: the beginning of the end of Canadian broadcast ownership requirements, downgrading the role of Canadians in their own productions, risks to Canadian intellectual property ownership, trade retaliation by the U.S., potential capture of news sites and smaller streaming services, and less consumer choice as services work to avoid the costly Canadian regulatory requirements. Yet for some these costs will still be worth it since their singular goal is to mandate that foreign streaming services contribute funding toward Canadian film and television production. Indeed, Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault has made this the centrepiece of his “get money from web giants” strategy claiming that this will result in a billion dollars a year by 2023 in new funding. As this post documents, those claims massively exaggerate the likely funding impact.
Archive for December 11th, 2020
Episode 73: The Broadcasting Act Blunder – Why Minister Guilbeault is Wrong
by
Michael Geist

December 14, 2020
Michael Geist
December 7, 2020
Michael Geist
November 9, 2020
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 20: The Case Against Bill C-10
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 19: The Misleading Comparison to the European Union
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 18: The USMCA Trade Threat That Could Lead to Billions in Retaliatory Tariffs
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 17: The Uncertain Policy Directive
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 73: The Broadcasting Act Blunder – Why Minister Guilbeault is Wrong