The results of this summer’s online harms consultation remains largely shrouded in secrecy as the Canadian government still refuses to disclose the hundreds of submissions it received. Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez now leads the file, but he has said little about his department’s plans or explained why a public consultation should not feature public availability of the submissions. I have maintained an ongoing blog post with links to dozens of submissions that have been independently posted. While even a cursory review reveals widespread criticism, I’ve worked with the University of Ottawa law student Pelle Berends to do a deeper dive on the available submissions. This first post identifies the common concerns raised in the submissions with a chart breaking down the positions posted below. A second post will highlight frequently raised recommendations.
Archive for December 15th, 2021

Law Bytes
Episode 154: The House is Back – A Preview of Canadian Digital Policy as Parliament Resumes
byMichael Geist

January 30, 2023
Michael Geist
January 23, 2023
Michael Geist
January 16, 2023
Michael Geist
December 19, 2022
Michael Geist
December 12, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
“This Law Will Be One of Scapegoating All Those Who Do Not Fit Into What Our Bureaucrats Think Canada Should Be”: Bill C-11 is Back with Stunning Rebuke From Senator David Adams Richards
“Ongoing Concerns”: U.S. Objections to Canadian Digital Policies Spreads to the Senate
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 154: The House is Back – A Preview of Canadian Digital Policy as Parliament Resumes
Champagne’s Choice
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 153: Jennifer Quaid on the Competition Bureau’s Appeal of the Rogers-Shaw Merger Decision