Post Tagged with: "copyright"

Bell’s PVR Legal Woes the Tip of the C-61 Iceberg

Appeared on August 18, 2008 as PVR, Bill C-61 Might Soon Make You An Outlaw Canadians watching the Olympic coverage from Beijing can hardly have missed the Bell commercial touting a new digital video recorder that features an external hard drive permitting users to "record forever." The archiving functionality may […]

Read more ›

August 18, 2008 Comments are Disabled Columns Archive

The Globe and Mail on C-61

The Globe and Mail publishes its masthead editorial on C-61.  The verdict?  While supportive of the intent of copyright reform, it notes the concern over how the bill mirrors the DMCA and expresses disappointment over the failure to extend and adapt fair dealing, stating that: Perhaps the Conservatives do not […]

Read more ›

August 18, 2008 3 comments News

Athabasca University VP on C-61

Athabasca University Associate Vice-President of Research Rory McGreal has a great op-ed in the Edmonton Journal.  McGreal argues that "the proposed new Bill C-61 will have profound negative effects on researchers and educators as well as the general public, preventing them from exercising their historical rights. We need to balance […]

Read more ›

August 18, 2008 1 comment News

Canadian Press on the Canadian Copyfight

The Canadian Press covers the online fight for fair copyright and against Bill C-61.

Read more ›

August 18, 2008 4 comments News

61 Reforms to C-61, Day 40: TPMs – No Regular Review Process

The U.S. DMCA experience leaves little doubt that the introduction of anti-circumvention legislation will create some unintended consequences.  No matter how long the list of circumvention rights and other precautionary measures, it is impossible to identify all future concerns associated with anti-circumvention legislation.  The U.S. DMCA addresses this by establishing a flawed tri-annual review process.  The system has not worked well, creating a formidable barrier to new exceptions and long delays to address emerging concerns.

As bad as the U.S. system is, the proposed Canadian system under Bill C-61 is worse since there is no mandated review of the exceptions at all.  Instead, Canada gets a flexible process that will allow the government to consider new exceptions if and when it sees fit.  In other words, the same government that brought you the Canadian DMCA will decide if there is a need to add any exceptions. Section 41.2 (1) provides that:

Read more ›

August 15, 2008 5 comments News