CPCC's David Basskin responds this week's private copying column in a Toronto Star letter to the editor. Basskin points to a CPCC-commissioned public opinion survey that found public support for the levy.
CPCC Responds to Private Copying Column
August 10, 2007
Share this post
2 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
byMichael Geist
April 22, 2024
Michael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
Many people do not even know the levy exists. Among those who do, many support it because of the belief that the levy shields Canadians from lawsuits like the ones occurring in the US. I suspect that if you explicitly denied that protection under the levy, support would drop substantially.
Where does that bulk of the levy money come from though? It comes from computer based businesses that do not copy music.
Musicians get payed when you buy a CD – now that’s fair. To get payed when I burn photos to a CD is grossly unfair. To get paid when I copy music from my CD to my iPod is unfair – they’ve been paid already when I bought the CD. To get paid twice for the same piece of work is unfair.
Basskin comissioned a study that says just what he wants it to say – just like any good survey should. You should never comission a survey unless you know it will give precisely the answer you want. Survey people on a issue that they’re ingorant of the issues, and you’ll get distorted results.
For music to be treated in this way, when no other IP is treated in this way is unfair. Why not compensate Canadian software companies through a levy on computer sales to pay for pirated software? Because it’s bloody stupid to do so – people would just pirate software and Canadian software companies would go bust.