The CAUT reports that Minister Gary Goodyear, who holds responsibility for science and technology, threatened to withhold federal budget funding to the SSHRC over its support of a controversial academic conference.
CAUT Reports SSHRC Funding Threatened Over Conference Support
September 29, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments
The LawBytes Podcast
Recent Posts
Making the Best of a Bad Provision: Why Canada Should Work Toward a Copyright Term Extension Registration Requirement
Taking Value out of the Copyright Tariff Process: The Copyright Board’s Access Copyright Post-Secondary Tariff Decision
The LawBytes Podcast, Episode 35: Allen Mendelsohn on Canada’s Copyright Site Blocking Saga
Honouring Ian Kerr’s Legacy: University of Ottawa Launches the Kerr Fellows Program
The LawBytes Podcast, Episode 34: The Fight to Save the Dot-Org
Recent Podcasts
- Episode 35: Allen Mendelsohn on Canada’s Copyright Site Blocking Saga December 9, 2019
- Episode 34: The Fight to Save the Dot-Org December 2, 2019
- Episode 33: “Canadian Patenting is Not Going to Drive Anything” – Aidan Hollis on New Research on Patents and Innovation November 25, 2019
- Episode 32: Reflections from the Open Source Member of Parliament – A Conversation with Ex-MP David Graham November 18, 2019
- Episode 31: Is Canadian Media in a Financial Crisis? – Marc Edge With a Different Take on What the Data Says November 11, 2019
Actually
the headline says that. The quote from the email talks about withholding increased funding for SSHRC.
Does it matter?
Either way, SSHRC gets the wrong end of the deal.
@Bytowner
Does it matter? In a sense, it does. What I understood from the headline, and from the writeup above, lead me to believe that he was threatening to cut off all funding (i.e. a 100% decrease) rather than a 0% increase. These are very different things, akin to a wage freeze vs being fired.
Let’s say the government gives them $1M, and they were requesting an additional $100K for next year.. The writeup here, and in the first para of the linked article “threatened to withhold federal budget funding to the SSHRC” implies that he threatened to give them a budget of $0. Nada. Zilch.
However, the article’s statement “and is so serious that it will make it hard for the Minister to recommend increased funding for SSHRC in the next budget” means that, instead of the $1.1M that they asked for, they get $1M.
Do they get the wrong end of the deal? It could argued yes. However, given the budgetary flak the government is under, one shouldn’t expect an increase in funding. The funding increase could be refused even if this wasn’t an issue.