Corus Quay by JasonParis https://flic.kr/p/9QoQgb (CC BY 2.0)

Corus Quay by JasonParis https://flic.kr/p/9QoQgb (CC BY 2.0)

News

Super-Secret Submissions: Corus and SaskTel Block Disclosure of Their BTLR Submissions Claiming Prejudice to Their Competitive Position

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been posting several of the more notable submissions to the Broadcast and Telecommunications Legislative Review Panel submissions that were previously not released to the public. These included Bell, Shaw, Cogeco, Quebecor, CWTA, and a Rogers submission that was released months after the submission deadline. The Access to Information office at Minister Navdeep Bains’ ISED has now completed the request and says it cannot disclose submissions from Corus and SaskTel. Both companies are apparently taking the position that they can withhold disclosure of their submissions on competitive grounds, citing Section 20(1)(c) of the Act:

Subject to this section, the head of a government institution shall refuse to disclose any record requested under this Act that contains …
(c) information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to result in material financial loss or gain to, or could reasonably be expected to prejudice the competitive position of, a third party; or

The notion that a company can stop public disclosure of submissions to a public process by claiming prejudice to a competitive position raises serious transparency concerns about public processes. As I told the ATIP officer, withholding an entire document – even including materials that are presumably introductory in nature and surely inconsequential to a competitive position – creates a level of secrecy that runs directly counter to the very goals of open government. While the submissions will be made publicly available within a matter of weeks, the process associated with BTLR secrecy ultimately reflects poorly on the panel itself which unnecessarily adopted a secretive approach, Corus, SaskTel, and the government.

3 Comments

  1. This is entirely ridiculous.

    The rules should be, that if you want to participate in a PUBLIC consultation, you need to be prepared to have your submission made, uhm, well, PUBLIC!

    If you cannot make a submission that will be PUBLIC, you DO NOT get to participate in PUBLIC policy.

  2. Well we know what they want, absolute protection period. We don’t even have to see it, block everything from Canada but us!

  3. Marilyn Jay says:

    The only way it could “compromise their competitive position” is if it was so consumer unfriendly as to turn (more) people against them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*