Appeared in the Toronto Star on August 17, 2009 as Designing a Copyright Bill That's Built To Last As the national copyright consultation launched earlier this summer hits the midway point, the first four weeks have attracted considerable interest. There have already been more than a thousand submissions, one town […]
Post Tagged with: "fair dealing"
CFHSS Issues Call for Copyright Action
The Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences (CFHSS) has issued a Call for Action on the current copyright consultation. The CFHSS, which made up of 69 scholarly associations, 75 universities and colleges and 7 affiliates, as well as more than 50,000 scholars, students and practitioners across Canada, focuses […]
Green Party on Copyright Reform
Green Party leader Elizabeth May and Griffin Carpenter, the party's youth and education critic, have published an op-ed with their views on copyright. They point to three key principles: extend user rights through a flexible fair dealing mechanism, reform crown copyright and the public domain to build a healthy information […]
Tracking the Copyright Consultation Roundtables: Fair Dealing Emerges As Top Issue
The copyright consultation roundtables have now passed the midway point with five completed (there may be as many as four still to go – Edmonton, Quebec City, and Toronto are confirmed, Peterborough is also apparently on the list). With many of Canada's big copyright groups having already appeared, it is worth taking stock of where things stand.
While there have been many issues raised – everything from ending crown copyright to reforms to photographer provisions – four in particular have dominated. First, there has been more support for extending fair dealing than any other issue. Over 20 participants have cited the need for expanding fair dealing, most calling for a much broader approach. There have been just a handful of opponents to this approach, primarily from the publishing and copyright collectives.
Second, the need to implement the WIPO Internet treaties has been raised repeatedly. Of course, WIPO implementation on its own doesn't say much – the key question is whether to adopt a C-61 style approach or a more flexible C-60-like approach on the anti-circumvention provisions. Thus far, there has been more support for linking anti-circumvention legislation to actual copyright infringement than for the C-61 DMCA-style model.
Third, there has been a steady stream of support for new levies and fees to compensate online copying. This has taken the form of an ISP levy for legalized P2P, an expanded private copying levy, or broader collective licencing schemes. This support derives primarily from the collectives and some artists groups.
Fourth, the role of intermediaries has come up frequently. ISPs and consumer groups have expressed support for the notice-and-notice system found in both C-60 and C-61. Others have called for notice-and-takedown, while yet others have hinted (or directly called for) a three-strikes system.
The chart below highlights the 64 organizations and individuals that have participated in the roundtables along with their key messages.
Tracking the Copyright Consultation Roundtables: Fair Dealing Emerges As Top Issue
The copyright consultation roundtables have now passed the midway point with five completed (there may be as many as four still to go – Edmonton, Quebec City, and Toronto are confirmed, Peterborough is also apparently on the list). With many of Canada's big copyright groups having already appeared, it is worth taking stock of where things stand.
While there have been many issues raised – everything from ending crown copyright to reforms to photographer provisions – four in particular have dominated. First, there has been more support for extending fair dealing than any other issue. Over 20 participants have cited the need for expanding fair dealing, most calling for a much broader approach. There have been just a handful of opponents to this approach, primarily from the publishing and copyright collectives.
Second, the need to implement the WIPO Internet treaties has been raised repeatedly. Of course, WIPO implementation on its own doesn't say much – the key question is whether to adopt a C-61 style approach or a more flexible C-60-like approach on the anti-circumvention provisions. Thus far, there has been more support for linking anti-circumvention legislation to actual copyright infringement than for the C-61 DMCA-style model.
Third, there has been a steady stream of support for new levies and fees to compensate online copying. This has taken the form of an ISP levy for legalized P2P, an expanded private copying levy, or broader collective licencing schemes. This support derives primarily from the collectives and some artists groups.
Fourth, the role of intermediaries has come up frequently. ISPs and consumer groups have expressed support for the notice-and-notice system found in both C-60 and C-61. Others have called for notice-and-takedown, while yet others have hinted (or directly called for) a three-strikes system.
The chart below highlights the 64 organizations and individuals that have participated in the roundtables along with their key messages.
Recent Posts
Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act 
AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act 
Tweets Are Not Enough: Why Combatting Relentless Antisemitism in Canada Requires Real Leadership and Action
