CIPPIC has posted a copy of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's preliminary finding on the requirement for LSAT test-takers to provide a fingerprint.
LSAT Fingerprinting Finding Posted
July 3, 2007
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 153: Jennifer Quaid on the Competition Bureau’s Appeal of the Rogers-Shaw Merger Decision
byMichael Geist

January 23, 2023
Michael Geist
January 16, 2023
Michael Geist
December 19, 2022
Michael Geist
December 12, 2022
Michael Geist
December 5, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
Champagne’s Choice
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 153: Jennifer Quaid on the Competition Bureau’s Appeal of the Rogers-Shaw Merger Decision
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 152: Konrad von Finckenstein on the Challenges That Lie Ahead for the CRTC
Listen Up: My Recent Podcast Appearances on Bills C-11, C-18 and Canadian Copyright Law
The Year in Review: Top Ten Law Bytes Podcast Episodes
SIN #
I also find it interesting that they require the SIN numbers with the fingerprints. In Canada it is used for incoming reporting and not identification. LSAC is not entitled to it and I am surprised by the number of future lawyers who do not appear to know some basic facts about Canadian law.
I think the solution is pretty easy – require a passport. If a passport can be considered good enough for all the countries in the world, it should be good enough for LSAC – especially with the new “high-secure” passports.
It appears that LSAC is complying with the ruling and that LSAT registrants at Canadian test centres will be required to bring along a recent photo instead.
See: [ link ]