The Ottawa Citizen profiles Richard Warman, who has lodged 15 complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission against neo-Nazis and white supremacists for spreading hatred on the Internet against Jews, blacks, homosexuals and other target groups.
One Man’s War on Internet Hate
July 11, 2007
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 278: Ben Waldman on Gander Social and the Challenges of Building a Sovereign Social Network
byMichael Geist

August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Buried in Bill C-39: The Enabling Digital Trade Act Brings Canada Its First Federal Electronic Trade Documents Law
A Definition That Meets the Moment: Federal Government Recognizes Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism
Nobody Can Say They Weren’t Warned: Canada’s Threat Assessments Predicted the Belleville Yom Kippur Attack
An AI Transparency Act for Canada: My Submission to the Government’s AI Transparency Consultation
Not If, But When: The Yom Kippur Terror Attack in Belleville

dinosaur
Warman sez you can cherry pick charter right 2, if people are Christian.
—————————————————————————–
Canadian charter of rights and freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
Fundamental freedoms 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
a) freedom of conscience and religion;
b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
d) freedom of association.
Not with Human rights commisisons on the prowl.
One Man’s War on Internet Hate
On the internet hatred can be very misleading and dangerous, therefore ” b)” should be presented in a professional, rather than hateful manner, more clearly defined to include a valid reason for their expression and opinion based on fact and sited from reliable sources. It should be treated as essays are in university. i
In addition,for every view there should be an opposing view so a balance is reached for people reading the internet so they can decide which they choose to believe.