Day five of the CRTC's New Media hearings featured some good exchanges with the CWTA over the profitability of new media over wireless along with evidence that the National Film Board "gets it" when it comes to the Internet and new media. Carleton professor Ira Wagman provides the details on his blog. Thanks to Elizabeth Martin for compiling the report.
CRTC New Media Hearings – Day Five: CWTA, DiMA, NFB, CIA, AN
February 26, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age
byMichael Geist

March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
March 16, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
More Surveillance Demands to Come?: Government Admits Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Provisions Could Be Expanded
Win, Lose or Draw?: The Federal Court of Appeal Overrules a Key Copyright Case on Procedural Grounds
The Lawful Access Debate Begins: Canadians Should Pay Attention to What the Government Isn’t Saying
The Global Battle for Data Control: How the 2026 U.S. Report on Trade Barriers Targets Data Sovereignty Worldwide
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 264: Jon Penney on Chilling Effects in the Digital Age

It appears the CBC has stabbed us in the back on this one
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/02/26/crtc-cbc.html
There’s a knife in our back with CBC fingerprints on it.
How on earth does the CBC figure that? Why not support an “Air Tax” on all Canadians to subsidize all the over-the-air TV stations too?
There are no borders on the internet, period! No one country should benefit more. Especially since the CanCon that the tax would generate would never (legally) be seen on the internet.
CanCon made for the net on the internet is HUGE! We are a very creative people when it comes to online stuff.
I would rather any taxes on the ISP’s go to bolster India’s Bollywood, at least they have hot actresses! Something we sorely lack.
So uhhhh… do any of the speakers have a strategy to actually make us watch more Canadian content?
I mean, that’s what these proceedings are supposed to be about, and there’s never any suggestion on how to do this, other than “Give us more money” without any accountability?
Money Sans Accountability
Dan Said: “…Give us more money” without any accountability?”
Isn’t that the Canadian political way?
At least Obama ties strings to every dollar he dishes out.