The Canadian Independent Record Production Association has posted its submission to the copyright consultation. Notwithstanding the industry's repeated assurances that it does not plan to file lawsuits in Canada, CIRPA calls on the government to establish "the retention of data by users for a sufficient period to allow for effective law suits to be launched and brought to completion."
CIRPA Calls for Longer Data Retention To Facilitate Lawsuits
September 23, 2009
Share this post
9 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban
byMichael Geist

February 9, 2026
Michael Geist
Episode 256: Jennifer Quaid on Taking On Big Tech With the Competition Act's Private Right of Access
February 2, 2026
Michael Geist
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 255: Grappling with Grok – Heidi Tworek on the Limits of Canadian Law
January 26, 2026
Michael Geist
December 22, 2025
Michael Geist
December 8, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 257: Lisa Given on What Canada Can Learn From Australia’s Youth Social Media Ban
Court Ordered Social Media Site Blocking Coming to Canada?: Trojan Horse Online Harms Bill Clears Senate Committee Review
An Illusion of Consensus: What the Government Isn’t Saying About the Results of its AI Consultation
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 256: Jennifer Quaid on Taking On Big Tech With the Competition Act’s Private Right of Access
Government Says There Are No Plans for National Digital ID To Access Services

It’s only a matter of time before the lawsuits hit if they get the required legislation.
The industry assurances don’t mean anything, they already tried once and failed. They will start again when they have their green light.
If the new copyright bill doesn’t give it to them, ACTA certainly will.
Excuse me lawsuits? There will be no lawsuits, they industry was serious about not having lawsuits. Thats why they tried to have the last law passed that allowed them to accuse and “fine” customers. The whole point of the law they tried to ram down our throats was so they would not have to spend a dime to extort “their” $$.
If they don’t plan to file lawsuits…
then increasing the retention period isn’t necessary. Of course, if the statement about no plans to file lawsuits is simply a marketing ploy…
CIRPA = CRIA = RIAA
This is why I am voting Pirate Party of Canada
At least they will get funding… making votes count and having proportional representation is another matter.
You know it saddens me when the so-called “independent” organization are becoming more like CRIA’s little brother…the same old hypocritical “I don’t want to sue them” but secretly going to sue them anyways BS. It’s no wonder that the Manitoba’s music organization separate itself from the “national” organization because of the conflict of interest from the provinces.
“It’s no wonder that the Manitoba’s music organization separate itself from the “national” organization because of the conflict of interest from the provinces.”
In simple terms, what it’s necessary for the national organization doesn’t always mean the same for the provinces independently.
Sue your customers?
I don’t understand record companies thought process on this one, most of the people who download music pay for it too or at the very least give money to the music industry one way or another and isn’t there a tax on recordable CDs already in-place to offset this?
Sue your customers?…Yes
Jeff, it’s never enough for the record companies to get tax incentives from CDR’s and other recordable and storage devices. They rather bitch, complain and sue as means necessary to get what they want. Simple partisan logic.