Canada's Privacy Commissioners have issued a resolution calling on the government to proceed with caution on its lawful access legislation. The resolution calls for evidence that the new provisions are needed, seeks alternatives, and sets conditions for striking the right balance.
Privacy Commissioners Urge Caution on Lawful Access
3 Comments
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules 
From Making Web Giants Pay to Paying Media Giants: Budget 2026 Replaces the Government’s Internet Platform Strategy With $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars for Culture and News 
Has the Government Read Its Own Bill? What Three Days of House Debate Revealed About Bill C-34 Before the Committee Hearings Begin 
Surveillance By Design: Government Officials Say Lawful Access Could Reach Gaming Platforms, Daycares and AI Services 
Canada’s First Digital Trade Agreement: Why the Canada-EU Deal Will Likely Follow Europe’s Template and What That Means for Canadian Digital Law
More important than copyright
I hope we can get the same kind of popular support speaking out against this legislation as we did with Bill C61. While balanced copyright reform is important, the ability to freely and privately communicate on the Internet will become increasingly fundamental for a democratic society; there’s a reason why oppressive regimes censor and spy on their net users.
In case anyone missed it, here is a June Search Engine interview with Minister Peter Van Loan about the proposed legislation:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/m5enrj
Highlights include:
-Fearmongering “think of the children” rhetoric
-Van Loan’s assertion that Canadians have no legitimate expectation of privacy when they use the Internet
-Inaccurate, misleading parallels between an IP address and a phone number
Urgent for this 2011 election:
It’s surprising there’s only one comment on this important notice about the obvious deep concern of Canada’s federal, provincial and territorial privacy commissioners about the proposed legislation.
The Commissioners are all speaking with one voice on this. The federal Privacy commissioner is a servant of Parliament. The resolution addresses not just the Prime Minister and his party, but all Parliamentarians.
Can you tell us whether and where responses to the Commissioners have been made by the government? By other MPs?
Are there any journalists or advocates who are particularly advancing or following this legislation?
These aren’t rhetorical questions – I would seriously appreciate knowing or be pointed toward the answer. I would like to ask well-founded questions during this election. Thanks.
I’ve just seen your chat with Marc Garneau. Thanks for this work.
T.