Gilded Age for Cable
March 21, 2011
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 271: Taking Stock of a Wild Week in Canadian Digital Policy With the Online Streaming Reversal, AI Strategy Release, and Lawful Access Review
byMichael Geist

May 25, 2026
Michael Geist
May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Everything You Wanted to Know About a Kids’ Social Media Ban (But Were Rightly Afraid to Ask): A FAQ on Age Verification and Mandated ID for Everyone
Bill C-22’s Clause-by-Clause Problem: The Government Includes Agencies Seeking Lawful Access Powers But Blocks the Privacy Commissioner’s Return
You Can’t Put the Toothpaste Back in the Tube: Why the Government’s Reported “Temporary” Plan for a Kids’ Social Media Ban Would Mean Mandated ID for Everyone
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 271: Taking Stock of a Wild Week in Canadian Digital Policy With the Online Streaming Reversal, AI Strategy Release, and Lawful Access Review
Canadian American Business Council on Bill C-22: It “Threatens Our Bilateral Partnership on Data Security”

Another reason for those tidy UBB profits …
For the two boys and father JR Shaw, the company faces a future retirement bill of some $147 million, according to its own actuaries. The amount these three men have paid into this plan: zero.In the end, the Shaw family gets away with it only because the other shareholders don’t complain about it. Why don’t they complain? Because despite all the fat, the company remains ridiculously profitable, just like the rest of the major players in the Canadian cable and phone racket.
And remember the cablecos Rogers, Shaw, Videotron(all of which have stolen landlines from Bell and Telus) are all responsible for this. The telco bashing at Bell and Telus has to stop.
So what
This is going to be mighty unpopular to say, but so what? If you don’t like what they charge you, you can always go over-the-air. Take the middleman out of the deal. Ok, you won’t get TSN, etc. The cable companies provide a luxury service for television. If enough people start to do this, then they’ll lower the prices (after all, they make more money if they get $50 profit from 100 customers than $60 from 50 customers).
Add to this that the revenues for the cable channels will also go down; if more people go over the air, the viewership of those channels goes down. They lose subscription money and advertising revenue, and start to put pressure on the cable companies to lower the margins and may in fact have to take a cut in their own margins.