Creators’ Access Copyright on AC’s 2010 Financial Statements
June 22, 2011
Tags: access copyright
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
byMichael Geist

Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
April 20, 2026
Michael Geist
March 30, 2026
Michael Geist
March 16, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Is Data De-Identification Dead?: Why the AI Privacy Risk Isn’t What It Learns, But What It Figures Out
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 265: Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
A Standard That Doesn’t Exist: Parliamentary Secretary for Justice Offers Misleading Defence of Bill C-22’s Lower Threshold for Subscriber Information
More Surveillance Demands to Come?: Government Admits Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Provisions Could Be Expanded
Win, Lose or Draw?: The Federal Court of Appeal Overrules a Key Copyright Case on Procedural Grounds

Such uninformed nonsense. No wonder these folks can’t make a living from writing.
Are we to infer from Michael Geist’s quote from DC Reid that the noted scholar agrees with the financial statement analysis presented? Or is this just more of the same scattershot criticism, hoping something at some point will hit the mark?
I DO agree with Mr. Reid when he writes:
“These are big figures and illustrate once more that writers could use some advice from a lawyer and an accountant telling them what is in their best interests.”
I encourage consultation with a lawyer and/or accountant right away. It’s always best to know what you’re talking about before you talk.