No related posts.


From CCH to ChatGPT: How Canadian Copyright Law Played the Key Role in Deciding a Leading AI Training Data Case in India
Starting Over: Court Filing Confirms the CRTC’s Streamer Contribution Decisions Are Dead With a Full Online Streaming Act Reset to Come
The Name on the Window Was Enough: The Attacks on Kiva’s and the Normalization of Antisemitic Violence in Canada
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 277: Kate Robertson on the Risks That Lie Behind Canada’s Unexpected Signing of the UN Cybercrime Convention
A Surveillance Treaty in Disguise: The Trouble With Canada’s Quiet Decision to Sign the UN Cybercrime Convention
Michael Geist
mgeist@uottawa.ca
This web site is licensed under a Creative Commons License, although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed.
Take it or Leave it?
Certainly makes the decision process on the TPP quicker. So, now we would have to negotiate trade agreements with each of the preferred, moderate countries one by one, instead of all together? I’m OK with that – we’d probably end up with better, more-resonant deals, anyway.
Have it our way …
Do they at least get Fries with that?
“Coalition of the willing”
Looks like ACTA was just a dry run. Ratchet it up a couple more notches and try again with a smaller and “more willing” group?
And…
what do the other TPP “early entrants” parties have to say? The USTR can huff and beat its chest all it wants if the other “early entrants” parties are willing to allow the “late entries” to have a voice, especially if there is no actual agreement.
A partnership where one partner tells the other that they’re gonna take what they get and aren’t allowed to have an opinion. Funny, where I come from we call that an *abusive* partnership.