Blackout Speakout
Tags: blackout speakout
2 Comments
Recent Posts
The Exemption Illusion: Why the Government’s Plan to Fast Track Bill C-34’s Kids’ Social Media Ban Means No Standards, No Privacy Review, and No Enforcement 
Unpacking Bill C-34: My Appearance on the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel Podcast 
Liberal MP: Lawful Access “Has Nothing to Do With the Privacy of People and Their Information” 
The Law to Be Named Later: Bill C-34 Punts 50 Key Decisions to Cabinet and a Digital Safety Commission That Does Not Yet Exist 
Everything All At Once: Bill C-34 Combines Platform Duties, a Kids’ Social Media Ban, AI Chatbot Regulation, and a Powerful Digital Safety Commission Into a Risky “Trust Us” Bet
Can one legitimatrely say “reform”?
If one proposes to denigrate something, is it a reform? The word usually means “Make changes in (something, typically a social, political, or economic institution or practice) in order to improve it” (courtesy of Google).
“Deform” is perhaps harsh, but at least apropos.
–dave
Hard to tell.
According to the CBC, the Minister said “The government will move to a “one project, one review” policy on environmental projects by recognizing provincial reviews, as long as they meet the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act”. By this I read that, so long as the review undertaken for the provincial government meets the requirements of the federal legislation, that a second review would not be necessary to produce a second report stating the same thing.
If this is what they are shooting for, then the theory is sound, although the implementation may not be. Look at it this way. Take the hypothetical situation of Ontario and Toronto both having drivers licenses, with the requirements being exactly the same; in order to drive in Toronto you must have a city license. As well, the city test is the same, or even more comprehensive, than the provincial test. So, in this situation, would it not make sense that the province recognize the city test and also issue a provincial license? If the tests covered different things, then by all means the province should do its own testing, since the provincial requirements would not be covered.
Again, all of this, in the end, comes down to the implementation of the proposed changes. It may turn out to be worse for the environment, or it may be neutral. Only time will tell.