Last week, I joined the Broadcast Dialogue podcast to talk about the recent developments at the CRTC. The discussion started with my post likening the Commission response to consumer issues under Chair Ian Scott file as a Seinfeld-like Penke File and moved into an assortment of other recent CRTC issues. When asked about the CRTC’s failure to name-and-shame the telecom companies most responsible for misleading tactics, I responded that “it left the distinct impression that the CRTC under Ian Scott is more interested in protecting the reputation of the incumbent companies than the interests of individual Canadians.” The full podcast discussion can be accessed here and is embedded below.
The CRTC listened intently to the CFRO presentation by Robin Puga (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) https://flic.kr/p/8XhHm1
A CRTC More Interested in Protecting Incumbent Companies Than Consumers: My Appearance on the Broadcast Dialogue Podcast
February 26, 2019
Share this post
4 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 218: Emily Laidlaw and Taylor Owen on Saving the Online Harms Act
byMichael Geist
November 4, 2024
Michael Geist
October 28, 2024
Michael Geist
October 21, 2024
Michael Geist
September 30, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- How the Online Streaming Act Misdiagnosed Canada’s Broadcasting Woes
- Canadian Government to Ban TikTok (the Company not the App)
- Why the Conspiratorial Responses to Canada’s Antisemitism Guide Demonstrate Its Necessity
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 218: Emily Laidlaw and Taylor Owen on Saving the Online Harms Act
- CRTC Approves Google’s $100 Million Online News Act Exemption Deal
What a useless institution is that CRTC 🙁
Hope to have Transcript with this one. Deaf cannot hear your podcast
Wow! we just cannot believe this
Pingback: News of the Week; February 27, 2019 – Communications Law at Allard Hall