privacy-is-dead by td-london https://flic.kr/p/62afS1 CC BY-NC 2.0

privacy-is-dead by td-london https://flic.kr/p/62afS1 CC BY-NC 2.0

News

Government Enacts Political Party Anti-Privacy Rules With Bill C-4 Royal Assent Sprint

I’ve written extensively about Bill C-4 and the government’s effort to bury political party privacy rules that largely eliminate privacy obligations for federal political parties and apply the new rules retroactively to May 2000. This past week’s Law Bytes podcast featured Senate hearings on the bill, which ultimately resulted in an amendment to require the government to establish actual privacy obligations within three years. The government yesterday rejected the amendment and the bill received royal assent in a lightning-fast process.

It began with the House rejecting a Senate amendment to the bill.

Only one MP – Elizabeth May – spoke to the motion. No other MP had anything to say.

Given the silence, the motion moved immediately to a vote. No need for an actual vote though. Just an agreement to “carry on division.” The motion rejecting the Senate amendment that merely required the government to establish real privacy rules within three years was passed.

With the House rejection, the matter went immediately to the Senate. It quickly agreed to withdraw its amendment to Bill C-4.

And so the House was quickly informed that the amendment was withdrawn.

Within minutes, Bill C-4 received royal assent. Bill passes without privacy safeguards and without any real discussion or debate. All within a matter of hours.

Tags: /

2 Comments

  1. Colin Bennett says:

    Thanks for laying this appalling sequence of events out, Michael. And now on to the Court of Appeal and the decision about the applicability of BC PIPA to the FPPs.

  2. What does all this mumbo jumbo on Bill C4 mean in language that a plumber or chamber maid can understand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

*