Post Tagged with: "special 301"

Patry on the Special 301 Report

Bill Patry has a great post on the USTR Special 301 report, questioning the decision to single out Canada for "serious concerns."

Read more ›

April 28, 2008 Comments are Disabled News

Canada Remains in Good Company in USTR Special 301 Report

The U.S. Trade Representative has released its annual Special 301 report, in which it criticizes dozens of countries over their intellectual property laws while ignoring its own shortcomings.  Despite demands from the copyright lobby that Canada be placed on the "Priority Watch List," Canada is again on the lower level […]

Read more ›

April 25, 2008 8 comments News

Canada Remains in Good Company in USTR Special 301 Report

The U.S. Trade Representative has released its annual Special 301 report, in which it criticizes dozens of countries over their intellectual property laws while ignoring its own shortcomings.  Despite demands from the copyright lobby that Canada be placed on the "Priority Watch List," Canada is again on the lower level […]

Read more ›

April 25, 2008 Comments are Disabled Stop CDMCA

Patry on Israel and the USTR

Bill Patry features a great blog posting on Israel, the USTR, and the IIPA.

Read more ›

March 23, 2008 1 comment News

Responding to the IIPA’s “Inaccuracies and Hyperbole”

Last month, the IIPA, a lobby group representing a handful entertainment industries, released its annual submission to the United States Trade Representative criticizing the copyright laws of dozens of countries around the world.  That submission will likely play an influential role in next month's USTR Special 301 Report.  As usual, Canada was on their list, leading to the usual press coverage claiming that Canada is a laggard on copyright reform.  While Canadian officials have criticized the USTR Special 301 report, to my knowledge the government has never made a formal submission defending Canadian policies.

This year, the USTR received 24 submissions, including comments from three countries – Israel, Poland, and Turkey (the USTR has posted the non-governmental submissions for the first time this year).  The Israeli submission has been posted online and provides a great model for how countries should be defending their national interests.  The submission, which characterizes the IIPA submission as containing the "usual inaccuracies and hyperbole," includes a great defense of Israeli copyright policy.  For example, on the issue of anti-circumvention legislation it notes:

Read more ›

March 17, 2008 3 comments News