Bill Henderson has an op-ed in the Georgia Straight (which btw has been providing a great diversity of perspectives on copyright) promoting the Songwriters Association of Canada legalized P2P proposal.
Bill Henderson on the SAC Proposal
August 20, 2009
Share this post
2 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
byMichael Geist
April 22, 2024
Michael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 200: Colin Bennett on the EU’s Surprising Adequacy Finding on Canadian Privacy Law
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
SAC has softened it a bit…
Although there are still parts of the proposal that I have problems with. First of all, it is an opt-out system, not opt-in… basically a negative option billing scheme, which, if I understand it correctly is banned.
Secondly, it specifically mentions that broadband and wireless customers would have the option to opt-out. What about dial-up subscribers? Will they be billed and not have the option to opt-out? Dialup users are even less likely to engage in this simply because it isn’t particularly useful at dialup speeds (for instance, at home I get 26.4 kbps… at that speed, it takes about 40 minutes to download a 3 minute song).
They might get a better reception if it was an opt-in system.
Then what
Thats like the last time when this topic was brought up here, around a year ago, and some song writer association wanted people to pay something like 5$/month to download all they want.
Again, I’ll make the same argument using only Bell Canada stated figure of over 2-million internet subscribers (think this may have only been high speed)
5$/month x 2-million = $10,000,000 a month
Thats an insane value for only 1 ISP in Canada.
+ the hundreds of million in their levy.
I would rather see money like that funneled into health care or research into diseases like cancer or leukemia etc.
After 3 years then what? They will want to increase it to 8$/month because they aren’t making enough. Music only?
Voluntary?
Why not just make a new tax line on the income tax? Artist tax. If you bought so much and have receipts, then the value should be 0$.
What would people pay per year on their income tax for such an Artist tax? Worth 60$/year? And if you can prove you bought say some arbitrary number like 120$ worth should it be 0 on the tax line?
But instead he is just saying give me.