UK Government: Public Access for Publicly Funded Research

I realise this move to open access presents a challenge and opportunity for your industry, as you have historically received funding by charging for access to a publication. Nevertheless that funding model is surely going to have to change even beyond the positive transition to open access and hybrid journals that’s already underway. To try to preserve the old model is the wrong battle to fight. Look at how the music industry lost out by trying to criminalise a generation of young people for file sharing. It was companies outside the music business such as Spotify and Apple, with iTunes, that worked out a viable business model for access to music over the web. None of us want to see that fate overtake the publishing industry.

Wider access is the way forward. I understand the publishing industry is currently considering offering free public access to scholarly journals at all UK public libraries. This is a very useful way of extending access: it would be good for our libraries too, and I welcome it.

When will Gary Goodyear, Willett’s equivalent in the Canadian cabinet, give the same speech and adopt the same policies?


  1. Crockett says:

    How refreshing … A politician advocating for the public good by telling industry to send their broken business practices to the dustbin.


  2. Ray Saintonge says:

    For a Canadian cabinet minister to be permitted such a statement it must first pass a test for ideological correctness.

  3. Beats By Dre says:

    Beats By Dre
    By Dr. Dre headphones rhythm, to ensure

  4. Open Access says:

    Open Access
    “The Coalition is committed to the principle of public access to publicly-funded research results. That is where both technology and contemporary culture are taking us. It is how we can maximise the value and impact generated by our excellent research base.”

    What it means for in this present situation?