Newsweek covers the mounting consumer concerns with DRM and the grassroots anti-DRM campaigns (hat tip – BoingBoing).
Newsweek on DRM
November 22, 2006
Share this post
One Comment
Law Bytes
Episode 221: Inside My Canadian Heritage Committee Appearance on Freedom of Expression
byMichael Geist
December 2, 2024
Michael Geist
November 25, 2024
Michael Geist
November 18, 2024
Michael Geist
November 4, 2024
Michael Geist
October 28, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Government Finally Splits the Online Harms Bill: Never Too Late To Do The Right Thing…Or Is It?
- Canadian Media Companies Target OpenAI in Copyright Lawsuit But Weak Claims Suggest Settlement the Real Goal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 221: Inside My Canadian Heritage Committee Appearance on Freedom of Expression
- When Antisemitism Isn’t Taboo: Reflecting on the Response to Nazi-Era Hate on the Streets of Montreal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 220: Marina Pavlović on the CRTC’s Plans to Address Consumer Frustration Over Wireless Contracts
Recording industry still doesn’t unders
The last paragraph is the most telling. In the VHS vs Betamax market shakedown it was simply two incompatible media formats. With DRM the entire purpose is to have copyright holders encode their content such that it is only accessible using “authorized” players — by definition, coming up with an interoperable standard isn’t possible as the purpose of the technology is to reduce interoperability.
If music is accessible by all music players, then the DRM “doesn’t exist”.