The Economist explores the benefits of piracy.
The Economist on Piracy
2 Comments
Recent Posts
Back-of-the-Napkin Cultural Policy: The Government’s $600 Million Streaming Plan Copies the CRTC Decision It Killed at More Than Double the Cost 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules 
From Making Web Giants Pay to Paying Media Giants: Budget 2026 Replaces the Government’s Internet Platform Strategy With $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars for Culture and News 
Has the Government Read Its Own Bill? What Three Days of House Debate Revealed About Bill C-34 Before the Committee Hearings Begin 
Surveillance By Design: Government Officials Say Lawful Access Could Reach Gaming Platforms, Daycares and AI Services
point is, the benefit is to the copyright owner in some of these cases, not the person doing the pirating
Yes, the copyright owner in fact can see a benefit through piracy. The statement about Microsoft is not surprising. If taken through the long view, some, but not all, piracy becomes free advertising.
In the case of music, the artist can be exposed to many more potential fans than would normally be the case. Certainly they lose a little potential money, the publisher much more, on that downloaded song. I say potential because there is no guarantee that it would have been bought. However, if the person likes the artist’s work, they are more likely to buy the original album and subsequent work than if they hadn’t been able to sample it (I have done this myself). Here the independent artists, and the not-so-mainstream artists are the winners, artists who don’t have the marketing budget that groups such as Sony EMI have for Kanye, Jayzee, etc.