The Economist explores the benefits of piracy.
The Economist on Piracy
2 Comments
Recent Posts
Bill C-22’s Groundhog Day: Why the Government’s Dismissal of Signal, Apple and the U.S. Congress Concerns Runs Back the Disastrous Online News Act Playbook 
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots 
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests 
Make It Make Sense: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Plan
point is, the benefit is to the copyright owner in some of these cases, not the person doing the pirating
Yes, the copyright owner in fact can see a benefit through piracy. The statement about Microsoft is not surprising. If taken through the long view, some, but not all, piracy becomes free advertising.
In the case of music, the artist can be exposed to many more potential fans than would normally be the case. Certainly they lose a little potential money, the publisher much more, on that downloaded song. I say potential because there is no guarantee that it would have been bought. However, if the person likes the artist’s work, they are more likely to buy the original album and subsequent work than if they hadn’t been able to sample it (I have done this myself). Here the independent artists, and the not-so-mainstream artists are the winners, artists who don’t have the marketing budget that groups such as Sony EMI have for Kanye, Jayzee, etc.