NDP Digital Affairs critic Charlie Angus publishes an op-ed on the current copyright consultation and the potential "to get it right."
Angus: C-61 Was “Bulky, Unenforceable, and Ultimately Ridiculous”
July 28, 2009
Share this post
2 Comments
Law Bytes
Episode 221: Inside My Canadian Heritage Committee Appearance on Freedom of Expression
byMichael Geist
December 2, 2024
Michael Geist
November 25, 2024
Michael Geist
November 18, 2024
Michael Geist
November 4, 2024
Michael Geist
October 28, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Canadian Media Companies Target OpenAI in Copyright Lawsuit But Weak Claims Suggest Settlement the Real Goal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 221: Inside My Canadian Heritage Committee Appearance on Freedom of Expression
- When Antisemitism Isn’t Taboo: Reflecting on the Response to Nazi-Era Hate on the Streets of Montreal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 220: Marina Pavlović on the CRTC’s Plans to Address Consumer Frustration Over Wireless Contracts
- Protecting Freedom of Expression: My Heritage Committee Appearance on the Chilling Effect of Antisemitism
archives of helen langille
the copyright for nafta has been in effect since 1989. patents and trademarks. also legislation.
archives of helen langille
the copyright for nafta has been in effect since 1989. patents and trademarks. also legislation. i have copies of their work.