NDP Digital Affairs critic Charlie Angus publishes an op-ed on the current copyright consultation and the potential "to get it right."
Angus: C-61 Was “Bulky, Unenforceable, and Ultimately Ridiculous”
2 Comments
Recent Posts
Lawful Access Heads to Committee: The Opposition Found Its Voice, the Government Never Found Its Defence 
Is Data De-Identification Dead?: Why the AI Privacy Risk Isn’t What It Learns, But What It Figures Out 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 265: Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI 
A Standard That Doesn’t Exist: Parliamentary Secretary for Justice Offers Misleading Defence of Bill C-22’s Lower Threshold for Subscriber Information 
More Surveillance Demands to Come?: Government Admits Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Provisions Could Be Expanded
archives of helen langille
the copyright for nafta has been in effect since 1989. patents and trademarks. also legislation.
archives of helen langille
the copyright for nafta has been in effect since 1989. patents and trademarks. also legislation. i have copies of their work.