Rogers Internet Management.pdf
Archive for February, 2011
Pulling a Fast One?: Who Is Really Hurt By C-32’s Missing Fair Dealing Circumvention Exception
For example, yesterday he asked the Canadian Federation of Students how it could justify “eliminating digital locks altogether by allowing circumvention for fair dealing purposes?” Last week, he had a similar exchange with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, stating “my concern is if you go that extra step and allow circumvention for fair dealing, you’ve now made it so much more easy to actually allow the cheaters to undermine the system, where digital locks become absolutely meaningless.”
Fast has clearly given some thought to the digital lock issue, but he is wrong that linking circumvention to actual copyright infringement would render digital locks irrelevant.
RogersFeb11response
Microsoft Word – Ltr to CRTC re Internet Traffic Management Practices..pdf
Rogers Responds To CRTC Net Neutrality Concerns: No Need for Disclosure Changes
Rogers has responded to the CRTC’s concerns regarding its Internet traffic management disclosure policies. The company says that there is no need to update its disclosure practices regarding downstream traffic. It further questions why Rogers is being singled out for changing its disclosure policies, arguing that while it is true […]
Rogersnetneutresponsefeb11
Letter to Robert Morin 20110211 Final.pdf