The New Zealand tribunal responsible for copyright graduated response cases has issued its first decision. The tribunal ordered an individual to pay $616.57, which included $6.57 for three songs, $50.00 for notice fees, $200 for the application fee, and a $360 deterrent fee ($120 per song). Most striking is that the New Zealand law forces the tribunal to statutorily presume infringement, despite an absence of evidence and denials by the individual.
New Zealand Tribunal Issues First Graduated Response Decision
January 30, 2013
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection
byMichael Geist

October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection

Frodo would not approve …
So let me get this straight? In New Zealand if you steal a CD you are presumed innocent, but if you download a song you are presumed guilty?
Is courting the American content industry, regardless of those lovely LOTR landscapes, really worth upending a citizens basic legal rights?
Aside from that …
As I read more on this case it appears the defendant has ‘confessed’ to downloading one song, well the same song twice actually. The fine in the end being around $600. Is $300 per song still excessive? That is arguable, but this makes me wonder how Voltage Studios will fare in light of this level of judgement. Australian courts are based on many of the same principals as our own, so that’s one more reason to not fold to an extortion letter in the thou$ands.
Whoops!
I just called the NZ court Australian. My sincerest apologies!
I best watch for flying kiwis 😉
I agree
As I read more on this case it appears the defendant has ‘confessed’ to downloading one song, well the same song twice actually.
wise data recovery