The New Zealand tribunal responsible for copyright graduated response cases has issued its first decision. The tribunal ordered an individual to pay $616.57, which included $6.57 for three songs, $50.00 for notice fees, $200 for the application fee, and a $360 deterrent fee ($120 per song). Most striking is that the New Zealand law forces the tribunal to statutorily presume infringement, despite an absence of evidence and denials by the individual.
New Zealand Tribunal Issues First Graduated Response Decision
4 Comments
Recent Posts
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots 
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests 
Make It Make Sense: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Plan 
Why Social Media and AI Chatbot Bans for Kids Are Bad Policy: Making the Case at the Senate Social Affairs, Science and Tech Committee
Frodo would not approve …
So let me get this straight? In New Zealand if you steal a CD you are presumed innocent, but if you download a song you are presumed guilty?
Is courting the American content industry, regardless of those lovely LOTR landscapes, really worth upending a citizens basic legal rights?
Aside from that …
As I read more on this case it appears the defendant has ‘confessed’ to downloading one song, well the same song twice actually. The fine in the end being around $600. Is $300 per song still excessive? That is arguable, but this makes me wonder how Voltage Studios will fare in light of this level of judgement. Australian courts are based on many of the same principals as our own, so that’s one more reason to not fold to an extortion letter in the thou$ands.
Whoops!
I just called the NZ court Australian. My sincerest apologies!
I best watch for flying kiwis 😉
I agree
As I read more on this case it appears the defendant has ‘confessed’ to downloading one song, well the same song twice actually.
wise data recovery