Of all the claims that accompanied the launch of the Bell coalition’s website blocking plan – piracy rates (weak evidence) and claims of harm (unsupported by the data), inferences that the absence of a court order is commonplace (it isn’t), that the blocking will be strictly limited (unlikely), and that site blocking is effective (considerable data says otherwise) – the most audacious is surely the repeated assurances that site blocking does not raise net neutrality issues. Given that the starting principle for net neutrality is the right for users to access content and applications of their choice, blocking content is prima facie a net neutrality violation.
Archive for February 23rd, 2018
Episode 77: The Complexity of Internet Content Regulation – A Conversation with CIPPIC's Vivek Krishnamurthy
by
Michael Geist

February 22, 2021
Michael Geist
February 8, 2021
Michael Geist
January 25, 2021
Michael Geist
December 14, 2020
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 77: The Complexity of Internet Content Regulation – A Conversation with CIPPIC’s Vivek Krishnamurthy
Beware the Unintended Consequences: Some Warning Signs for Canada from the Australian Government Battle With Facebook
The Copyright Bill That Does Nothing: Senate Bill Proposes Copyright Reform to Support Media Organizations
Circumventing Parliament: How Bill C-10 Dramatically Reduces Parliamentary Oversight and Review Over Broadcast Policy
Afraid to Lead: Canadian Government Launches Timid Consultation on Implementing Copyright Term Extension